I’m probably in the minority but I liked UNC coach Butch Davis more after the academic controversy surrounding the football team than I did before.
Before the controversy, I thought of Davis as someone who’d really rather be coaching in the pros. After all, every press conference seemed to have some reference to the NFL – whether it was comparing someone on the opposing team with a pro bowl player or just relaying stories from his earlier career.
Those who follow college football or the ACC or the Tar Heels don’t want to be minimized – and constantly comparing players and the college game to the pro game does just that. Davis also ditched Carolina Blue pants for pants that looked more like the Dallas Cowboys, whom he coached with.
But I thought Davis, who by all accounts did not know about the improprieties, handled the stress and strain of the investigation very well and had his depleted team ready to play each game. To go to a bowl game and win it under those circumstances was amazing.
He inspired his players. Now, those same players were notified eight days before practice was to begin that their coach had been fired. I could understand if some new revelations have emerged but UNC Chancellor Holden Thorp says that’s not the case.
Thorp claims that the University needs to get past all this negativity and get back the academic integrity.
Maybe if Davis had been fired back in January, I could also understand his thinking but I don’t see how getting rid of Davis now – after Davis represented UNC at ACC media day, after being given a vote of confidence from Thorp and UNC AD Dick Baddour (who has announced his resignation), after people have committed to their season tickets, and after recruits have committed to UNC and will have to sit out a year if they go somewhere else – does anything positive.
There are calls for Thorp to be fired himself (most notably the www.fireholdenthorp.com website). I suspect that the new board of trustees members, including leader Wade Hargrove, felt more strongly about Davis being fired than the previous members. That could be the reason for the timing but the timing leads to speculation and if Thorp, or anyone else, thinks the situation has improved now that Davis is gone and that the media stories will go away and that it’s the beginning of the end of the problem, he’s wrong.
Should Thorp be fired? Probably not but the situation does stain his reputation. Yes, academics should come first and maybe Davis being oblivious should be enough to get him ousted. But the way it was handled, especially the timing, was atrocious and will harm Carolina football and I believe the University’s reputation even more.
At this stage, Carolina should have just gotten through this season, dealt with the issues head on like it did last season and then made a coaching decision after the season. The University would still be a great academic institution and the football team would have won more games.