University should have allowed Mack Brown to go out on his own terms

Critics of Mack Brown argue that he had to go because his up-in-the-air status was hurting recruiting and the current football team. Well, who is to blame for that? It’s easy to say the legendary UNC coach shouldn’t be back after a 6-6 record and a couple of particularly bad losses. But had Bubba Cunningham come out in support of Brown after the loss to James Madison, the recruits wouldn’t have left (or not signed with Carolina) and I argue that the current team would have finished something like 8-4.

The Carolina football program, after all, is an 8-4 program. That’s who they are. Not everyone can be a football powerhouse year in and year out. Sure, the Tar Heels may have a great season maybe one out of every four or five years, and they may go 6-6 once out of every four or five years. But this is an 8-4 program.

The big wigs who hold the purse strings wouldn’t be content with winning seasons and bowl games. The problem is, does ending a revered coach’s career – particularly as it was done – actually help the program move forward and at what cost?

The way to handle the situation is this: Come out publicly in support of Brown during the season. Work with him behind the scenes to give him a choice of coaching one more season while grooming his predecessor or allow him to retire after the season. While the season didn’t turn out like Carolina fans would like, Brown did represent the University well. Many would prefer a 7-5 record under Brown than an 9-3 record under someone like Butch Davis.

Granted, Brown didn’t lead the team to a winning record this year – but again, I suspect stability would have been worth at least one win this season. The best answer would have been to announce that Brown is retiring after next season and a particular person was being groomed to take over the following year. That allows for a smoother transition and gives players confidence that there will be some stability.

I suspect QB Max Johnson – who, had he not gotten hurt, would have led Carolina to more victories – will transfer out of North Carolina. Starting all over again is not likely to help the Tar Heels improve much next season. Perhaps they will be an ACC contender in two or three years but that could have been the case by keeping Brown and grooming someone – and there wouldn’t be this unnecessary animosity with the most decorated coach the program has had – and one that led them through well-documented tough times off the field.

(The attached photo is during better times. Head football coach Mack Brown and his wife Sally were presented with a 100 jersey and a game ball respectively after the Tar Heels defeated the South Carolina Gamecocks Saturday night. Brown became the first coach in college football history to earn 100 wins with two schools. Photo by Jeffrey A. Camarati.)

6 thoughts on “University should have allowed Mack Brown to go out on his own terms”

  1. I completely agree with you. Good coaching is about more than wins and losses. Mack Brown has the knowledge of the game and has always given his best to the university. Most coaches would have fared no better after losing the top two quarterbacks to injuries. It is very poor form to treat a hall-of-game coach this way and we are in worse shape because of how the situation has been handled than from any coaching mistakes.

  2. You living in fantasy land. This aint 1980 Dick Crum years. This is 2024. It is all about the wins and losses. That drives support and money. Nobody is going to donate and go to the games for a 50% coach. Brown was no better than Fedora. Stands were 75% full if that. Why not strive for excellence versus just getting by. Terrible philosophy to live life.

    1. You very well may be right, particularly about the money and the change in the game. By the way, Brown’s record was better than Fedora’s but that wasn’t my point. Brown claims he was going to retire at the end of the season. Let him go on his own terms. As for continuity, it might have been better had the University chosen a coach in waiting and let him work with Brown for a season. The terrible philosophy is that college athletics is only about winning. I understand the winning is everything when you’re a professional but student athletics is supposed to be more than that.

  3. Brown’s comments after JMU laid the groundwork for his dismissal. Then holding the press conference saying he was staying while Cunningham in Maui was the final straw. Cunnigham stated publicly that he and Brown were requesting he step down end of season but when Brown made those press conference statements that was grounds for immediate dismissal. Cunningham is the boss. Go against the boss and you get fired. Doctor does not remove cancer partially. Cunningham was forced to get rid of Brown because he had become a cancer to the future of the program. In the corporate world security would have shown up and removed the bad employee immediately. Can’t let bad apples hang around. Clean house and start fresh.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *